Master the skills the job market is actually hiring for.

Follow a job-market-audited Role Path, move through a discipline end-to-end with a Career Pathway, or pursue a university-benchmarked Academic Certificate — each with a Basic → Intermediate → Advanced ladder, direct video learning bridges and a capstone proof-of-work project.

AI Evaluation, Safety & Reliability Engineering Bootcamp Certificate

Not Started0 / 10 complete

Open a video or resource link, watch it, then check its box to track your progress and unlock what comes next.

10 lessons1 capstone project

Search Live Openings

We don’t have a direct job-board feed matched to this one yet, so here are real, live US job searches for “AI Evaluation, Safety & Reliability Engineering Bootcamp Certificate” instead.

Bootcamp Mastery Certificate B45

Build eval-driven AI systems: datasets, graders, regression gates, RAG/agent evaluation, adversarial testing, monitoring and launch criteria.

Benchmark: OpenAI Academy, Microsoft, DeepLearning.AI / Weights & Biases, Arize AI and LangChain publish the referenced public learning videos. Zuyini independently curates the sequence and applies its own build-and-proof completion rubric; this is not a provider-issued certification or endorsement.

Core Video Sequence

01 — Evaluation lifecycle, test cases + scoring

02 — Production eval harness + regression testing

03 — Trustworthy launch workflows + real deployment lessons

04 — Agent evaluation, failure modes + guardrails

05 — LLM-as-judge, supervised evals + RAG quality

06 — Tracing + correctness / hallucination evaluators

07 — RAG answer correctness + dataset-based evaluation

08 — AI red teaming: injections, jailbreaks + defenses

09 — Automated adversarial testing with PyRIT

10 — Evaluation-driven tuning + quality/cost tradeoffs

Build-Along Checkpoints

  • Checkpoint 1: Define the system success contract, explicit acceptance criteria, failure taxonomy and a representative gold-set dataset before changing prompts or models.
  • Checkpoint 2: Implement deterministic assertions plus model-based graders; calibrate automated scoring against a human-labeled sample and document disagreement cases.
  • Checkpoint 3: Evaluate retrieval separately from generation; add groundedness, answer-quality, segment and edge-case analysis with traces that locate the failure stage.
  • Checkpoint 4: Evaluate agent plans, handoffs and tool calls; add adversarial cases for prompt injection, excessive authority and unsafe actions with explicit approval boundaries.
  • Checkpoint 5: Build a regression suite comparing model/prompt/tool configurations on quality, safety, latency and cost; define pass/fail thresholds and launch gates.
  • Checkpoint 6: Instrument production traces and online quality signals; simulate a regression, investigate it, roll back safely and capture the incident plus improvement loop.

7-Day Independent Capstone

  • Day 1: Choose a real AI workflow; define users, task-success criteria, safety boundaries, prohibited behavior, uncertainty and the decision the evaluation must support.
  • Day 2: Create a versioned eval dataset with normal, edge, ambiguous and adversarial cases; manually label a calibration subset and document dataset limitations.
  • Day 3: Build deterministic checks and model graders; measure grader agreement, false positives/negatives and explain where human review remains necessary.
  • Day 4: Add RAG or agent/tool evaluation: trace retrieval, reasoning and actions separately; create a failure taxonomy and diagnose representative failures.
  • Day 5: Run red-team and robustness tests including injection/jailbreak/tool-abuse cases; implement mitigations and re-run the same benchmark to prove improvement.
  • Day 6: Wire evals into CI/release gates; compare two configurations on quality, safety, latency and cost and trigger a simulated rollback from a failed regression.
  • Day 7: Publish repo, eval dataset/sample labels, grader design, regression report, red-team evidence, dashboard, demo, safety/reliability case and operations runbook.

AI Evals - Measure, Break, Gate & Improve

Ship an AI system whose quality and safety can be defended with reproducible evidence: design representative evals, calibrate graders, test RAG/agents, red-team failure modes and operate regression gates.

Proof Rubric — What Must Be Shown

  • DATASET: representative cases + versioning
  • GRADERS: calibration + human agreement
  • RAG / AGENTS: stage-level task evidence
  • ADVERSARIAL: red-team tests + mitigations
  • REGRESSION: repeatable gates + comparisons
  • RELIABILITY: traces, rollback + incident proof
  • ECONOMICS: quality / latency / cost tradeoffs
  • OPERATIONS: monitoring + review loop